Tuesday, 20 March 2018

ACW, 2nd Test of updated Brigade Fire & Fury. Game at NBHW

Last Friday at NBHW four of sat down for our second test game of the updated Brigade Fire & Fury. This time we were looking to confirm some of our assumptions on plunging fire from our first game as well as getting to grips with some melees.

So I rolled up another game using the Pick up Game chapter from the rules. This time only one Corps per side and I reduced the amount of artillery the dice rolls generated.

We decided to use the same size table, 3' x 4', but this time played across the narrow dimension. The features were added to give us some of the conditions we wished to test.

Woods and Swamp :- Rough Ground
Open Woods and River :- Broken Ground
Wheat Field :- Open Ground
Main Road :- Good Road
Farm Track :- Poor Road

Suggested Deployments

How that translated to the table.

The Union wait.

Knowing that we were wanting to get some melees in this time the Confederate players wasted no time with their advances. Several double quick moves soon saw the forward Union division in combat whilst both sides artillery got stuck in with either plunging fire on the advancing / defending brigades or counter battery fire.

Here they come boys!

Brigade with attached battery receive the Rebel charge.

The left hand Union brigade with attached battery didn't fair too well, both retreated behind the division on the hill. The right hand brigade did better, halting the charge with musket fire before counter charging and forcing the Confederate brigade to retreat broken.

The victorious rebels on the Union left flank then charged on towards the hill but halted short. This tempted to Union brigades to charge down the hill towards them. Unfortunately being over 4" away when they started and on a higher elevation than the target, they suffered passing fire from the Southern artillery on the opposite hill on their way in, added to the musketry of the defending brigades. This fight didn't go well for the boys in blue and red who were soon destroyed.

Not looking good for the zourves

It was about here that we ran out of time, although we had achieved our main aims of getting to grips with the melee phase as well as confirming some of the passing fire and other artillery fire rules.

End positions.

As a learning exercise it worked well. As a game it could benefit from a few changes, the biggest being some more ground behind the Union hill line so that units retreating didn't have to leave the table. The maps in my scenario download have been changed to reflect this.
The main things learnt were, standing in the open on a hill in range of opposing artillery is a lot more dangerous now than it was with the previous version of the rules and remember to include any passing fire you can when calculating defensive fire against a charge, it can make a big difference.
We are still debating whether to give defensive attributes to fence lines as historically troops did hunker down behind these for extra cover.

As mentioned the base labels and maps are available in my Scenario download section.

As usual more photos in the club's Facebook Album

Tony.








6 comments:

  1. Nice AAR and good looking pictures. I'm using these rules this coming weekend for a the Battle of Seven Pines.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, hope the game goes well. We have used a tweaked version of the original rules for Gettysburg and Antietam.

      Delete
  2. Did you use your new command stands? 😀

    Nice post! Now I am longing for ACW even more! The amount of artillery in this game seemed more appropriate. The figures and table look good too.
    Let’s talk fences: ACW rules are such a mixed bag on how they treat fences in regard to cover and such. Probably bc it’s hard to say just how much effective cover a snake rail fence actually provides. 😀

    I really like Regimental Fire and Fury, where fences don’t provide cover but do give a positive modifier to the maneuver check. Which fits my bias that the fence wouldn’t stop bullets very well but would make it easier to control the troops and maybe provide a small morale bonus. The trade off is that fences are broken ground. But the scale of the game is smaller (regiments).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes Stew the division and corps command stands were there. May have to remake the flags smaller having now found out the correct historical sizes.
      Agree on the fence thing, possibly more a felling of cover rather than actual effective cover?

      Delete
  3. A great looking game Tony, and it is nice to see the project coming together. I agree - there is nothing more frustrating than when retreating units have to leave the table before they have a chance to rally, but that is an easy fix.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Cheers Lawrence, it's a bit more embarrassing when it's your own troops with nowhere to rally and you designed the table layout and troop deployment.

    ReplyDelete